Would Hillary Clinton Make a Boring President?

When considering potential presidential candidates, the idea of a “boring” president might seem less than ideal. However, the question of whether Hillary Clinton would make a boring president can be intriguing. Let’s break down this complex scenario and explore some historical precedents.

George W. Bush: A Non-Boring Presidency

Take George W. Bush, for example. During his presidency, we witnessed significant events such as the September 11 attacks, two wars, and a downtick in the stock market, coupled with massive job losses. These events certainly added an engaging and often controversial element to his tenure.

The notion of a boring presidency, in contrast, stands in stark contrast to such historical narratives. Yet, many might argue that a presidency free from such dramatic and divisive moments could be more desirable.

The Dazzling Personality of Hillary Clinton

So, when it comes to Hillary Clinton, one might wonder why anyone would want a "boring" presidency. The person she surrounds herself with can greatly influence her image and the perception of her presidency. However, the dynamic and often dramatic nature of her past and current campaigns can make her presidency anything but mundane.

The Job of the President: Should It Be Boring?

Interestingly, a successful presidency should arguably be “boring.” It should operate smoothly, without frequent crises or emergencies. The chief entertainer role is not part of the presidential job description. If you desire entertainment, perhaps stay in for the night and binge-watch your favorite TV series instead of following presidential news.

For those who aren’t particularly interested in detailed government policy, a Clinton presidency might indeed be very boring. It will likely feature more well-rehearsed speeches, teleprompter readings, and scripted discussions with the press. There will be a monotony in structure and planned events, with few surprises thrown in.

Examples of Boring but Successful Presidencies

Historically, some of the most interesting presidents—such as FDR, Washington, and Lincoln—presided over periods marked by significant wars. However, historical interest does not necessarily equate to a good presidency. Switzerland, known for its long periods of peace, has a relatively boring history.

Does this mean Hillary Clinton’s presidency would be fascinatingly boring? Based on her level-headed approach to many issues, it’s possible her presidency would be relatively uneventful. But given her past, it would be ideal if it were truly boring.

A Desire for a Boring President

Ultimately, like any other voter, many people might prefer a president who handles important issues with a low-key, efficient, and uneventful approach. A hyper-aggressive, never-back-down approach might generate excitement, but it may not be in the country's best interest. The hope is for a president who gets crucial tasks done without stirring unnecessary controversy.

So, would Hillary Clinton make a boring president? Depending on one's preferences and priorities, the answer might be a resounding yes or no. However, it is clear that a presidency characterized by strategic, thoughtful leadership can be engaging in its own right.