The Great American Dilemma: Why Buying Only US-Made Products Is More Complicated Than You Think

When it comes to the question of whether Americans should buy products exclusively manufactured in the United States, the answer is quite straightforward: there are simply not enough consumer goods produced domestically to meet the demand. Despite efforts to support U.S. manufacturing jobs, the reality is that only a few niche markets can sustain themselves without relying on imports. However, the motivations behind this preference are rooted in broader concerns about labor practices and the potential costs associated with domestic production.

Motivation and Concerns

According to a study by Consumer Reports in 2013, the primary motivation for purchasing US-made goods is to support American workers and uphold ethical labor standards. There is a genuine concern that manufacturers in other countries use child labor or do not adequately compensate their workers, making the idea of supporting an "American-first" economy seem more appealing. However, these motivations must be balanced against practical considerations, such as the economic impact and availability of goods.

The Economics of Domestic Production

Buying only US-made products comes with significant economic implications. For many, the idea is rooted in the belief that consuming domestically produced goods can boost the local economy and protect jobs. However, this belief often clashes with economic realities. Here are a few examples to illustrate the challenges:

Consumer Goods Availability

Consider a simple item like coffee. The United States does not grow large amounts of coffee, with the majority imported from other countries. In Hawaii, specifically Kona, coffee is grown and sold at a premium, around $40 per pound. This high price would force consumers to give up coffee or replace it with other less expensive alternatives.

Similarly, tea is another product that is not grown in the US, making it unavailable for purchase. These examples illustrate the limited availability of domestically produced goods, which would significantly reduce the range and quantity of products available to consumers.

Manufacturing and Automotive Industries

Even in the automotive industry, which is a major manufacturer in the US, there are complexities. While companies like GM and Ford are based in the US, some products may come from foreign subsidiaries or global supply chains. Chrysler, once a proud American company, is now primarily controlled by Fiat-Chrysler. This raises questions about whether a product can genuinely be considered "made in America," especially if significant components or technologies come from abroad.

Then there's the matter of housing costs. When the US imposed a 22% tariff on imported Canadian softwood lumber, the price of new houses increased by 40%. This trend indicates that relying solely on domestic production can lead to higher prices and a reduced standard of living. It also suggests that trade policies can have significant impacts on the housing market and consumers' ability to afford new homes.

Textiles and Clothing

Textiles and clothing represent another area where the limitations of domestic production are evident. If you were to buy 20 shirts that are "only made in America," the cost would be around $60, assuming an average price of $3 per shirt. This price point is significantly higher than what is typically found in the global market, making it difficult for consumers to afford a wide range of clothing items.

Energy Prices

Energy prices in the US are another area where the reliance on domestic production can lead to higher costs. The US does produce a lot of crude oil, but much of it is sold overseas where prices are higher. The US then imports oil from countries like Canada and Saudi Arabia at the same high prices. This cycle ensures that gasoline prices remain relatively high, despite US domestic production.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the idea of buying only US-made products is fraught with practical and economic challenges. While supporting domestic industries and workers is laudable, the realities of limited domestic production, higher costs, and the global nature of many industries make it impractical as a widespread solution. The concept of the "island economy" where everything consumed is produced domestically would likely lower our standard of living to a level where everyone would experience poverty. Therefore, a balanced approach that leverages both domestic and international markets is essential to maintain a high standard of living.

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments below or connect with me on LinkedIn to discuss further.