Are You Surprised by the Allegations of Retaliation Faced by Whistleblowers from the IRS and Department of Justice?
There seems to be a consistent narrative emerging from certain quarters, one that suggests a disturbing pattern of retaliation against whistleblowers from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Some individuals, including myself, are not at all surprised by these allegations. In fact, the history of the U.S. government, particularly in the recent past, provides ample evidence of a systemic failure to treat whistleblowers with the respect and protection they deserve.
The IRS: Targeting Conservative Leaders
During the Obama administration, the IRS targeted conservative leaders with unprecedented audits. This pattern of behavior raises serious questions about the integrity of the IRS and its ability to conduct fair and impartial audits.
The most egregious example of this treatment involved the mysterious crashes of hard drives belonging to top leaders of the IRS during a dubious FBI investigation. The investigation was forced to drop due to lack of evidence, yet the top leaders of the agency were not held accountable for this suspicious incident. Instead, the matter simply disappeared, leaving many to question the motives behind the audits.
FBI Investigations and Selective Enforcement
The FBI's behavior during various high-profile investigations has further fueled the notion of selective enforcement and a double standard in the justice system. For instance, Hillary Clinton's potential bribery scheme, where she wiped her private server and had her employees destroy their phones, did not result in any serious consequences for her or her associates. Instead, these actions were seemingly protected under the guise of privilege.
On the other hand, Donald Trump faced a staggering level of scrutiny. Armed agents raided his home in search of classified documents, leading to his indictment for charges related to espionage. The stark contrast between the treatment of Trump and Clinton, and the lack of similar action against those involved in the Clinton server scandal, is a prime example of how selective the justice system can be.
Excessive Force and Intimidation
The actions of the FBI also extend to cases of excessive force and intimidation. Take the case of a preacher who was arrested by 26 armed FBI agents after shoving a pro-abortion supporter at a protest. Despite the incident not resulting in any physical harm, the scale of the FBI's response was disproportionate and clearly meant for intimidation purposes.
In another instance, the FBI paid Twitter three million dollars to silence the story about Hunter Biden's laptop, further demonstrating the agency's willingness to manipulate the narrative to protect those in power.
Conclusion: The Existence of a Separate Justice System
The evidence presented here highlights a significant issue within the U.S. government - namely, the existence of two separate justice systems for those in power and everyone else. The inconsistencies in how different individuals and groups are treated under the law raise serious concerns about the fairness and integrity of both the IRS and the DOJ.
If these allegations are true, they represent a reckless breach of trust between the government and its constituents. The process to examine these claims further through public scrutiny is essential, as we must hold those in power accountable for any wrongdoing.
Let's hope that the coming legal proceedings surrounding Hunter Biden will provide some clarity and justice for all involved. Only thorough investigation and transparency can restore the public's faith in the integrity of the legal system.