Is an Oblong Shape More Satisfying to Look at Than a Rectangle?
The debate over whether an oblong shape is more visually satisfying than a rectangle has been a topic of interest among designers, architects, and aesthetes for centuries. While some argue that rectangles are inherently unstable and symbolically associated with less desirable traits, proponents of oblong shapes claim a more primordial satisfaction and structural strength. Let’s explore this question in depth.
Psychological and Aesthetic Appeal
From a purely psychological perspective, oblong shapes are often seen as more natural and soothing. When placed side by side vertically, the space at the bottom where they curve away from each other becomes a point of interest and design. This curvature is similar to the natural forms found in much of the organic world, making it more aesthetically pleasing to the human eye.
In contrast, rectangles, with their four right angles and straight lines, can trigger a sense of structural instability unless they are divided into triangles. This division, while stabilizing, can create a subliminal anxiety that some find unpleasant. Aesthetically, rectangles often evoke associations with geometric, and perhaps somewhat sterile, shapes, such as those found in the designs of characters like Spongebob Squarepants or Robbie the Robot.
Historical and Cultural Significance
The ancient Greeks were known for their appreciation of aesthetic proportions. The Parthenon, a masterpiece of ancient architecture, is a prime example of the use of the golden ratio (approximately 1:1.618), which is closely related to oblong shapes. This ratio was believed to be harmonious and aesthetically pleasing, reflecting the balance and symmetry found in nature.
Even in the 20th century, design preferences seemed to align with political and social contexts. In the 1950s, conservative individuals often preferred oval or oblong shapes, which were seen as more traditional and conservative. Conversely, more liberal individuals tended to favor rectangles, viewing them as more modern and unconstrained. However, these preferences were also influenced by the broader socio-economic climate, where the era of 'famine' versus 'harvest' played a role in shaping these choices.
Practical Applications and Personal Opinions
On a more practical level, consider the example of a 'rest room' with two commodes side by side. One with a rectangular seat would likely be less inviting due to its association with stability problems and design sterility. The traditional oblong shape, with its natural curvature and inherent appeal, would be more visually and psychologically satisfying.
However, opinions on this matter can vary widely depending on individual preferences. Some people, particularly those interested in home decoration, may have a preference for rectangular shapes for their modern and minimalist aesthetic. Others, especially those who value natural forms and organic beauty, might favor oblong shapes for their design intrigue and naturalness.
Conclusion
The debate over the satisfaction of oblong versus rectangular shapes is nuanced and multifaceted. While there are valid arguments on both sides, the oblong shape does offer a primordial sense of satisfaction and a more natural curvature that can enhance aesthetic appeal. The final choice often boils down to personal preference and the broader cultural and historical context of design.
Ultimately, whether an oblong or rectangular shape is more satisfying is a subjective matter. The oblong shape may offer a more natural and soothing aesthetic, but rectangles have their own unique advantages and appeal. The best choice often depends on the specific context and the personal preferences of the observer.