Growing Up in the 70s vs 2000s: A Comparison of Generations
Recalling the differences between growing up in the 1970s and the 2000s, it's fascinating to contrast the stark contrast in lifestyle, societal norms, and the impact of technology.
Living Life Without Modern Conveniences
Back in the 1970s, life was markedly simpler. We didn't have car seats for little kids, and they were reserved for infants. Children rode in the back of pickup trucks or station wagons without the safety of seatbelts, and people seemed more unconcerned about safety regulations. Our entertainment was limited to video games, TV, and imagination - tech hasn't proliferated yet, and cell phones and tablets hadn't been invented. The world was less noisy, and we spent more time playing outside. There was no cyberbullying; bullying was done in person.
Impact of Pop Culture and Social Issues
While societal and political transformations certainly affect an individual's outlook, their formative experiences, particularly in childhood, often exert a more profound influence on one's worldview. As an 80s kid, I've witnessed numerous changes, yet these have not created a significant divide between my generation and those born a decade later.
Social Issues and Growing Acceptance
One of the most notable differences is the acceptance of social issues like LGBTQIA. When I was growing up, this community was not widely accepted. Even now, my children are part of the community, which didn't feel the need to hide it from me. The evolution of social norms continues to shape our interactions and values. Guidelines and standards for what is acceptable have shifted dramatically over time, making it essential to reevaluate and adapt.
The Phenomenon of 'Cancel Culture'
A significant shift that stands out is the rise of 'cancel culture'. People are getting increasingly frustrated with canceling individuals or entities for past mistakes. The backlash against Uncle Jemima and Aunt Jemima’s name changes, and the banning of Pepe the Frog illustrate how some aspects of pop culture and imagery are being reevaluated. The approach to handling these issues can be seen as overly reactive. For instance, changing names without fully addressing the misrepresentation can be seen as superficial.
Examples of Misguided Cancellations
Some of the most criticized cases include Uncle Jemima and Aunt Jemima. Changing the name, rather than the imagery and messaging, might not be enough to address the deep-seated issues. Similarly, the portrayal of Pepe the Frog has caused controversy, but simply canceling it may not be the best solution. Instead, using these instances as teachable moments to educate and foster understanding could be a better approach.
The United Front Against Injustice
A moment of shared global solidarity was the George Floyd murder. The world stood in unison for justice, a powerful demonstration of intergenerational and global unity. While cancel culture may sometimes feel excessive, it's important to recognize when public outrage is genuine and warranted. This event is a testament to what happens when a global community unites for a cause, which is something to be celebrated.
Critique of Excessive Cancellations
In conclusion, while some cancellations are justified, others seem excessive and can be detrimental. People should feel safe and comfortable expressing themselves without fear of being canceled for past mistakes. It's crucial to maintain a balanced approach that respects the past while moving towards a more inclusive and understanding future.