Are British Army DMS Boots Good or Bad? An In-Depth Analysis
The reputation surrounding the British Armyrsquo;s DMS Direct Mountain Sole boots is mixed, often reflecting personal experiences and specific use cases. Whether these boots are a reliable choice depends on various factors, including the bootrsquo;s durability, water resistance, support, and overall comfort. In this article, we will delve into the pros and cons of the DMS boots to provide a comprehensive review.
Pros and Cons Analysis
Durability and Support
The DMS boots are renowned for their robust construction, which often lasts for several years with proper care. Their design ensures good ankle support, a critical feature for military operations in rugged terrain. However, the bootrsquo;s weight can be a significant drawback, particularly during long marches or operations. Additionally, the break-in period can be uncomfortable for new users, as the boots require significant wear before they become truly comfortable.
Water Resistance and Comfort Post-Break-In
Many DMS boot models are designed to be water-resistant, making them suitable for wet conditions. However, they can also be less breathable compared to newer synthetic materials, which can lead to discomfort in hot conditions. This can be a problem, especially for those deploying in warm climates.
Sole Design and Traction
The sole design is another point of contention. The traction provided by the sole can be inadequate on slippery or uneven surfaces, compared to more modern designs. This can compromise the wear and tear resistance, especially for HGV drivers who find themselves going through a pair every six months. The material lining the sole was often cardboard, which only added to the bootrsquo;s shortcomings.
Historical Context and Issues
Early Production and Use
The DMS boots were initially cheap to manufacture and featured a moldable toe cap and a patterned plastic sole. These features replaced the heavier ammunition boot, which had a leather sole with metal studs to prevent wear. This change aimed to improve the overall comfort and user experience.
Issues and Shortcomings
Despite their advantages, the DMS boots faced several significant challenges. The lack of a sewn-in piece behind the lace holes allowed water to seep in, especially if the foot was submerged in a puddle even briefly. This issue was compounded by the use of boilerplate insoles, which were built from layers of mesh and were often discarded. In the Falklands War, these issues led to numerous cases of trench foot, a condition requiring evacuation to a hospital ship. Unfortunately, once evacuated, the soldiers were often prevented from returning to active duty due to the rules of war.
Replacement with the Boot Combat High
These issues eventually led to the replacement of the DMS boots with the Boot Combat High. However, the first iteration of this new boot caused soldiers to develop tendinitis, highlighting the challenges of transitioning to a new pair of shoes.
Conclusion
Overall, the DMS boots are respected for their durability and support, but they may not meet everyonersquo;s preferences, especially those who prioritize lightweight and breathability. Personal experiences vary widely, and many soldiers have had their own opinions based on their specific needs and conditions.